Skip to main content

Skills Packets Won't Help You Now (or ever...)

Recently, I was talking to some adult education folks about needed revisions to their High School Equivalency courses. It quickly became an opportunity to discuss the importance of ensuring the Instructional Shifts lived in all of our instructional materials and classroom practices...

High School Equivalency (HSE) courses are mostly test-prep, designed to helps students take and pass various HSE exams (such as the GED, HiSET, or TASC). Until the recent past, these tests were built around skills assessment. With the adoption of the CCR Standards for Adult Education by most programs throughout the US, this has markedly changed. These HSE exams are now largely knowledge-based tests. GED’s website states the exam has four subjects and tests in the following areas: “Math - Quantitative & algebraic problem solving; Science - Life science, physical science, earth and space science; Social Studies - Civics and government, U.S. history, economics, geography and the world; Reasoning Through Language Arts - Ability to read closely, write clearly, and edit and understand written text”.  Gone are the days that skills packets have any hope of preparing adult education students to pass the GED (did they really ever?). As a test of knowledge, HSE preparation courses must be based on the learning of content through the reading of complex text and engagement with corresponding tasks. Skills packets won't help you now.

To be ready to take and pass any HSE exam, students will need some amount of background knowledge in and familiarity with the various content areas and disciplines mentioned above. Therefore, programs must provide test preparation in the form of content and text-based materials that provide not only valuable knowledge in the areas of literature and science but also some familiarity with question types and test-taking strategies. (And even better yet, in doing so programs are in line with the Instructional Shifts necessitated by CCSS and CCRS). Listed below are some examples of what HSE test prep courses and practices might look like in an alternative environment (a word of warning, lots of exemplars here from RISE Academy!):
  • Examples of how to create instructional block around both test-preparation and building of various knowledge types can be seen the HSE 100 Literacy course materials developed by RISE Academy for Adult Achievement, available here. Designated for use in a single, 8-week HSE course (for the high school equivalency tests: TASK, HiSET, or GED), these materials focus on the literacy, content, and test-taking needs for students signed-up for any non-math HSE test.
  • Examples of providing targeted, differentiated HSE prep for students not yet ready to enroll in RISE's HSE 100 Lit course (students with low level TABE results), students have the opportunity to take 1 to 2 quarters of HSE 90 (HSE 90 1 or HSE 90 2) prior to enrolling in HSE 100. These 90 courses have a similar literacy, content, and test-taking preparation focus as the 100 courses, but provide materials at a lower reading level to meet students’ needs.
  • If further, more elaborate, content area focus is needed, programs often provide single content area courses as a preparation (for either Adult High School Diploma or HSE preparation). See example of US Government course maps from RISE.
  • As a resources for teachers across various content areas, RISE has created and implemented across different courses these academic literacy strategies. Professional development has been provided for each and all have been strategically placed in various RISE curriculum maps to support reading, writing, and speaking about complex text.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'Focusing on the Core for All' - Session 1 for Science

Options Area science educators gathered this morning for their first session of   'Focusing on the Core for All' , the Options NVACS professional learning cycle for the 2015-2016 school year. This group includes teachers from Options Area schools, Implementation Specialists from MTSS and Student Support Services departments, Student Support Services area administrators, and Options Area school site principals, each of whom has chosen a content focus for the year (English Language Arts, History-Social Studies, Science, or Mathematics). The professional learning cycle for this year builds on that of past years (namely, the   High School Core Task Project   and   Shifting Instruction to the Core ) and is focused on  supporting teachers, implementation specialists, and administrators in the Options Area to expand and deepen alignment of instruction, materials, and programs  Common Core Standards  and  Instructional Shifts  so that all students are prepared for college and career.

Shifting Instruction to the Core, ELA Session II: Writing to Sources

English Language Arts teachers and their administrators gathered this morning for the second session of Shifting Instruction to the Core. Participants continued their focus   Instructional Shift 2  and  Core Action 2  from their  previous session , this time with an emphasis on writing to sources. The session included a reflection on teacher's classroom use of Keep It or Junk It , a review of Core Action Two and Argumentative Writing, a careful annotation of "The Writing Revolution" , engagement in a lesson model for ranking evidence, and time to apply the lesson to their future lessons. Materials for the session are linked below. Presentation deck in  PDF Reflection Note Taker College and Career Readiness Anchor Standards for Writing ELA Writing Standards Grades 9-10 Instructional Practice Guides for ELA/Literacy   ELA/Literacy  Instructional Shifts Excerpted copy of "The Writing Revolution"  Annotation Guide : Annotating for Claim-Reasoning-Evidence

The Importance of Curriculum, Part One

I have curriculum on the brain this summer. Most of my current work is focused on curriculum; reviewing it, curating it, or exploring it in some way. Simultaneously, there is an increasing amount of scholarship in the field on the importance of curriculum. Much of this work answers the questions; does curriculum really matter? And if it does, what can we do about it? Educators in the field, academics, publishers and supportive organizations are recognizing that quality curricular materials can support equity in our schools, be a significant force for reform, and act as a key ingredient in high performing classrooms. Of recent note is the Aspen Institute's report, "Practice What You Teach" , which provides relevant research, profiles of curricular implementation, and key recommendations. EducationNext has a great post by Chester Finn titled " Education Becomes a Reform Strategy ". The latest research report by StandardWork, " Curriculum Research: What We K